I wrote a piece in Salon about how cultural conservatives (but also everyone) aren’t serious about their process arguments when it comes to really anything, but in particular issues of gay inclusion in society. Certain cultural conservatives say, when it’s convenient for them, to use market and civil coercion — the battlefield of civil society… Continue reading The Future Is Sophistic
Kevin Williamson’s Hilarious About Face
Writing in February against using laws to discipline those engaged in anti-gay bigotry, the National Review’s Kevin Williamson went for the old libertarian line: If anything, it is much more likely in 2014 that a business exhibiting authentic malice toward homosexuals would be crushed under the socio-economic realities of the current climate. That is a… Continue reading Kevin Williamson’s Hilarious About Face
Hobby Lobby April Fools Joke
In my last post, I wrote about the absurdity of economic process in the realm of the Hobby Lobby religious liberty arguments. To drive the point home at how arbitrary this procedural silliness is, I have a hypothetical April Fools joke one could play on Hobby Lobby. Hobby Lobby opposes “paying” for IUDs. Medicaid, government… Continue reading Hobby Lobby April Fools Joke
Process, Religious Liberty, and Contraception
I agree with Elizabeth Stoker’s take that the Hobby Lobby contraception stuff is really confused. Ostensibly, Hobby Lobby is objecting to having to “pay” for the contraception coverage of its employees. This is contrasted with other forms of financing contraception, which we are told by those who argue on behalf of Hobby Lobby are permissible.… Continue reading Process, Religious Liberty, and Contraception
No violence but personal violence
When I use the word violence in the context of discussing theories of property, I mean a specific thing by it: acting upon the bodies of others without their consent. This is as neutral a definition of “violence” as you will find. It is the definition of violence implied by the concept of self-ownership. It… Continue reading No violence but personal violence