The median libertarian out there on the internet (especially in the sad pits of Reddit) seriously thinks the non-aggression principle does work in favor of their preferred economic institutions. Even notable people like Jason Kuznicki of Cato can get sucked into this stupidity, though from what I recall of our last run in, he has… Continue reading Fun game: identify the aggressor in this animated gif
Subscribe to my newsletter
I write regularly at three different websites and periodically at this one. Presumably that makes it hard for people to keep up with everything. For those who care to keep up with everything, I’ve started an email newsletter. The newsletter consists of a weekly email with links to all of the things I have written… Continue reading Subscribe to my newsletter
Salvaging Non-Aggression for Egalitarianism
To rehash: the only world that follows the non-aggression principle is the grab-what-you-can world. In this word “nobody initiates force directly against another person’s body, but subject to that constraint, people regularly grab any external resource they can get their hands on, regardless of who has made or been using the resource.” This world follows… Continue reading Salvaging Non-Aggression for Egalitarianism
A Moral Exemplar?
To my surprise, the National Review has a piece arguing that Brandeis was right to disinvite Ayaan Hirsi Ali from their commencement ceremonies. In fact, a whole panel was assembled to defend Brandeis on this front. Here are some of the highlights, with each block of text from a different author: The invitation to deliver… Continue reading A Moral Exemplar?
Last Word On Mozilla
I wrote about the Mozilla CEO termination thing (I, II, III). The point of my writing on it was just to continue my long-standing project of pointing out that most procedural arguments — by which I mean content-neutral and substance-neutral arguments nominally divorced from policy and cultural preferences — are not serious. It seems to… Continue reading Last Word On Mozilla